Mod13 Dyn Dis Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

Mod13 Dyn Dis - Essay Example For instance, recruiting more workers during top season might be fundamental yet employing more during the low period of a business is silly. In the event that a change doesn't fit the current and future clients is may not be vital. Any change done should coordinate the corporate culture. Planned changes that don't coordinate corporate culture may bring about unintended outcomes, and along these lines business pioneers ought to stay away from them. A business head ought to guarantee that the association has the fundamental assets to actualize proposed changes (Langley et al., 2013). It may not be a helpful plan to execute changes which the association has no ability to suit. Planned changes that don't have quantifiable incentive to the business are not suitable. During the last occasion, I and my companions thought of a gathering whose crucial to tidy up the nearby town two times every month. We trusted this would spur individuals to keep up the town neatness. All the individuals from the gathering were school and college understudies concentrating in various zones. At first, the gathering looked sublime yet it wound up flopping after we continued school. There was nobody to run the gathering, and it wound up being inert. Our gathering flopped because of absence of a decent arrangement, absence of assets and absence of precise theory that are totally required for executing changes. Langley, A., Smallman, C., Tsoukas, H., and Van De Ven, A. H. (2013). Procedure Studies Of Change In Organization And Management: Unveiling Temporality, Activity, And Flow. Academy Of Management Journal,â 56(1), 1-13.

Actual film Essays

Genuine film Essays Genuine film Essay Genuine film Essay Arthur Miller utilizes characters and activity to investigate thoughts regarding various characteristics and feelings. He utilizes John and Elizabeth, for instance, to show the adoration that can get through on the off chance that you make a decent attempt at a relationship. He utilizes genuineness, through Proctor to show the great and the awful outcomes that can emerge out of coming clean and out of lying. He utilizes disloyalty through Proctor additionally; by Proctor taking part in an extramarital entanglements with Abigail. This shows how double-crossing can tear separated a marriage with one idiotic misstep. He shows insatiability and force through Danforth, by Danforth saying no deferment to the hangings just so his notoriety wouldnt be lost. He shows respect, through Giles, in light of the fact that Giles didnt answer affirmative or nay to being a witch. His last words were more weight and afterward he passed on. He kept up to his notoriety for being clever and by satisfying his name. Another way Miller associates through to the crowd is by utilizing various sensational gadgets. I am presently going to view a portion of the various strategies and how he does this. Mill operator utilizes various methods to construct and discharge pressure. One of these procedures is leaving you on bluff holders. He did this with Acts 1,2 and 3! With Act 1 Abigail and Betty had recently made allegations of whom they had seen with the demon, Act 2 Elizabeth had recently been removed, and Act 3, Proctor has quite recently admitted and Hale had stopped the court! He utilizes short staccato sentences to develop strain, as in Act 4 Elizabeth says, Giles is dead so it is short and incredible. That way we feel a greater amount of an effect. Additionally in Act 2 where John and Elizabeth first beginning talking, they are stating just what they have to, not broadly expounding. Delegate says would you say you are well today? What's more, Elizabeth says, I am though she could have broadly expounded, for example, yes Im fine much obliged, it was likely only a passing cold, and you? She kept it as quick and painless as could reasonably be expected, practically telling the crowd that they couldnt have a long streaming discussion since she presumed him. In any case, I found that having watched the film, seen it performed and having perused the play content, the most sensational was the genuine film. I think this is on the grounds that you can utilize gadgets, for example, camera shots and edges and music to expand the pressure. There were likewise a variety of scenes in the film that I hadnt found in the play. I think this is on the grounds that it would be excessively hard in a genuine play to move the scene props around in such a little space of time! In the film I likewise believed that it made it increasingly sensational by making them state the rulers petition not long before they were hung and the quantity of voices slowly diminishing as individually they got pushed off. I truly didnt like, nonetheless, the way that John didnt get the opportunity to state Amen. I believe that connections back to the shamefulness and mercilessness of the time. Toward the finish of Act 3 Miller has left us as eager and anxious as can be, yet as we enter Act 4, Miller utilizes the silliness of Tituba and Sarah to make our strain decline once more. In act 4 our pressure goes all over like a yo-yo with Proctors uncertain brain, we can never unwind! Before the finish of Act 4 our pressure is at its peak, particularly with the stage bearing the last drum move crashes, at that point uplifts brutally, Hale sobs in mad petition, and the new sun is pouring in upon her face, and the drums clatter like bones toward the beginning of the day air. Another strategy Miller utilizes, is emotional incongruity. He utilizes this to make immense measures of strain, for example, the issue among Proctor and Abigail. At the point when John and Elizabeth were separated from everyone else together without precedent for Act 2, pressure was high since we knew, and John realized what he had done, yet Elizabeth didnt. He utilizes delays to make a feeling of somebody thinking that its difficult to state something; they may be frightened, or even nervous. Arthur Miller utilizes language with layers of various implications. I am presently going to view a portion of the sentences he has assembled and whether they have more than one significance. In Act 1, John and Abigail are disregarded. They use words alluding to hot and cold and creatures to discuss sex in a roundabout way. This is on the grounds that it just wasnt a thing you would discuss! For instance perspired like a steed this could likewise mean simply sex and no adoration, as animals. Abigail says, You are no snowy man this could mean he isn't deadpan and freezing, he is hot blooded and energetic. Dissimilar to Elizabeth who she says is a chilly, whimpering lady. Abigail is attempting to state that John is the direct inverse to Elizabeth. She is asking why John would need to be with her? She is so extraordinary and doesnt fulfill him like Abigail does. Throughout the play Miller utilizes figurative language. In Act 2 John says I will fall like a sea on that court I think this implies the court will be ousted and will have a limited quantity of intensity contrasted with what John will have. Arthur Miller utilizes this language for various reasons. It might be to breath life into thoughts, or by making a connection through language to another unique circumstance and above all else to make the crowd utilize their minds and consider the play, as opposed to simply plunking down, watching it and failing to think about it once more.

The Scarlet Letter Light vs Dark

Characterized as a method of differentiating dim and light to feature components inside a bit of workmanship or a story, chiaroscuro is shown all through The Scarlet Letter by Nathaniel Hawthorne. Additionally predominant in numerous showstoppers made by Rembrandt during the 17 century, Rembrandt utilizes chiaroscuro to make a point of convergence in his works of art and bring out close to home idea. Hawthorne utilizes chiaroscuro to concentrate on the component of by and large sin and to represent clashes between characters.A correlation of chiaroscuro in Rembrandts artworks and Hawthornes The Scarlet Letter, gives a more profound comprehend of how light and dull assume a key job in the improvement of characters and topic. Sin is one of the most significant subjects in The Scarlet Letter. All through the novel, Hawthorne presents nature as being abhorrent. For instance, the timberland shows an ethical wild that is incorporated inside a dull and desolate climate. Anyway in Chapter 18 , Hawthorne utilizes chiaroscuro as a gadget to show an adjustment in the woods as Hester surrenders to the malevolence of nature and of her sin.Å" ¦she fixed the catch that secured the red letter, and, taking it from her chest, tossed it ¦All on the double, similarly as with an abrupt grin of paradise, forward burst the daylight, emptying a very flood into the cloud forest ¦  During this scene, Hester discharges herself from the weight that the red letter brings. As Hester surrenders to her normal impulses, the backwoods around her gradually starts to light up and become overwhelmed by light. This newly discovered light in the woodland that develops inseparably with Hesters bliss is demonstrated to be acceptable as well as should be expected dependent on Hawthornes tone.He centers around the magnificence of the light and how it features each living thing in the backwoods, nearly in a saintly way. The tone and utilization of chiaroscuro in this entry permits the peruser to accept t hat surrendering to your characteristic senses and needs isn't really off-base or wicked, however simply a piece of life. Rembrandt utilizes a comparative methodology in utilizing chiaroscuro in his artistic creation Nightwatch (1642). Rembrandt doesn't utilize the light to concentrate on a specific character or article in the canvas; rather he epitomizes the various examples of the composition by making a fight among light and shadows.The impact of utilizing light and dim in this work of art isn't intended to incite significant idea, but instead to show a practically fanciful relationship between the light and dull, like the impact showed by Hawthorne in the timberland scene. Hawthorne additionally utilizes chiaroscuro to show clashes among characters and the distinction as a part of their character or otherworldly prosperity. Å"Old Roger Chillingworth, all through life, had been quiet and personality, sympathetic, however not of warm affections ¦.Sometimes, a light flickered out o f the doctors eyes, consuming blue and foreboding, similar to the impression of a furnace ¦  Roger Chillingworth, Hesters spouse, is introduced to the perusers as a decent man that was extremely upstanding and given to his activity and everyone around him; in any case, he did not have any feeling of enthusiasm or love. Once Chillingworth discovered that Hester had submitted infidelity and would not name the dad of her illegitimate kid, it became Chillingworths mission to reveal the man that had lain with his better half in sin.He must hunt profound inside Dimmesdale, serve for the town and who Chillingworth accepts is mindful, utilizing both human and otherworldly solutions for remove the mystery with no expectation of excusing Dimmesdale. While Dimmesdale is viewed as a reliable man for the Puritan residents to present their own transgressions to, ones of which Dimmesdale encourages them to atone. Dimmesdale carried out a wrongdoing according to the Puritan culture, one conceived from his need to follow his regular sense where Hawthorne states to be acceptable and later admitted to the majority that he was surely the dad and the second culprit in this natural crime.Å"And, as he drew towards the nearby, a soul as of prescience had happened upon him ¦it was as though a holy messenger, in his section to the skies, had shaken his brilliant wings over the individuals for a moment on the double a shadow and a magnificence and had shed down a shower of brilliant certainties upon them.  This statement shows the way that the Puritan individuals saw their minister, a man that was both truly rotting before their eyes, however yet lit up by the expression of the gospel. Dimmesdale would then follow his lesson with the admission of his transgression, the last demonstration of his human life.Hawthorne utilizes chiaroscuro to delineate the distinction in the kind of wickedness inside the characters of Dimmesdale and Chillingworth. Chillingworth is a man that didn't sin i n the terms that Dimmesdale did, be that as it may, he looks for it without the plan to pardon. Hawthorne communicates this as evident malice and sin contrasted with Dimmesdales demonstration of following his characteristic nature, which isn't a transgression. Rembrandt utilizes chiaroscuro to portray the character or character inside his artistic creations. In Self Portrait as St. Paul (1661), the man in the gasping is lit while the foundation and his facial highlights are significantly darkened.The dim eyes and foundation speak to a kind of separation, regardless of whether the separation is because of an outward or inward battle. The light of the image gives one the feeling that the man is significant or regarded. In any case, the dull makes the crowd accept that the man is in a lot of battle or misfortune, conceivably making him be dim and cold in the feeling of character, similar to the delineation of Chillingworth portrayed by Hawthorne.Nathaniel Hawthorne utilizes a gadget kn own as chiaroscuro, differentiating light and dim components, to help build up the characters and topic inside The Scarlet Letter. The manner in which Hawthorne shows this advancement can likewise be seen in pieces by Rembrandt. Sin is depicted from various perspectives all through the novel. The woods is utilized as an image of good exposed state of which Hester surrenders to when she removes the red letter and discharges herself from her transgression. Right now, the dim troubling woods is overwhelmed with sublime excellence of light and life.This play with shadowing and light components can be seen in Nightwatch by Rembrandt. This paitning communicates a connection between the light and the dim and how they can exist simultaneously, anyway one will consistently triumph. On account of the backwoods scene, the light and the joy of Hester triumphed over the insidious that encompasses her. Hawthorne draws his characters out by having one observe components, Roger Chillingworth, and t he other character see components of light, Minister Dimmesdale.Hawthorne then goes further to communicate that the murkiness of one probably won't be of fiendishness expectation, yet rather dulled by regular sin of which the light could be recovered. Rembrandt shows this in the paint Self Portrait as St. Paul, demonstrating how shadows can make one look disengaged and profoundly or genuinely infertile. Chiaroscuro is an instrument utilized in both the abstract and expressions world that can assist with bringing out more feeling and crowd thought. Without it, the characters and symbolism would all be gotten between shades of miserable grays.

Malczewski and the ideas of Young Polnd Free Essays

As indicated by Satanists Stopcock. The break of the nineteenth and twentieth hundreds of years in Poland was a period notable for the issue that numerous craftsmen who spoke to that period had: they were continually searching for their own truth(s), they own way(s), their own style. They formed into two primary classes, the individuals who made work for â€Å"today’, that satisfied itself during the lives of the specialists and the individuals who attempted to build up another style (Art Novel to be exact) and system for making stylish structures and applied workmanship. We will compose a custom article test on Malczewski and the thoughts of Young Polnd or then again any comparative point just for you Request Now It’s proper to include that the last mentioned, that was made with the goal of a style was squashed by steel developments as well as lost it’s truth on the creation line, leaving It basically an authentic wonder. I anyway will focus on the previous. The Young Poland workmanship development, that was focused In Kara?w and occurred in the years 1891-1918 and is generally acknowledged as the Polish variant of innovation. (1) I will begin with a touch of social and recorded setting. The most recent many years of the XIX century and the initial 1 5 years of the Sixth, were supposed to be the most exceedingly awful time for post-segment Poland, yet additionally a period brimming with trust and a moderate social affair of aggregate activism after a murky of complete misery. Different variables prompted Pollard’s governmental issues not being considered in the plan of European legislative issues, yet rather left to be settled inside by the Probationers ( ). These components incorporated the fall of the January Uprising, the formation of the successful and joined Bismarck Reich the French-Russian partnership and the military and political disappointments of Austria, which drove the Austrian segment to be an ever increasing number of clutters and subject to Germany. This new development In mix with a respiratory environment and the loss of trust in a superior future, because of the Inability to acknowledge rout, prompted the general loss of enthusiastic resolve and the arrangement of supposed â€Å"tribalism†. The Polish individuals attempted to frame an approach of understanding. They attempted to work with the probationers, calmly concentrating on social, conservative and social advancement of Poland instead of attempting any risquã ©, striking activities toward self-governance, which was In the cognizance and any expectations of most, however acknowledged to be a far off dream as opposed to Immediate chance. This Is the blend of what the way of thinking f positivism in Poland implied. Social and rustication demonstrated the arrangement of understanding not so compelling. (4) Galatia (which is the place Maleness’s was brought up) had the best conditions for the advancement of â€Å"Polish national life†. The status-Hungarian government had immediately changed to a law based liberal state after a progression of political disappointments and ensured the numerous countries that It Incorporated a lot of political opportunity. Calla had it’s own legislature, the regulatory language was Polish, it had two Universities, in Karaâ ¶w and Lawâ ¶w just as numerous schools. As an end-result of dedication to the Viennese government they had opportunity to show their enthusiasm.. (3) The social circumstance in Poland was deteriorating and more awful for the white collar class: the modest work and was the purpose behind gigantic movement from the nation to urban communities and their fast development. The working class was abused, and they were getting troubled. They were transforming into a huge socio-political power, that could request change. Industrialization was taking it’s cost, the market was being overwhelmed with production line made consumables and was making a climate of discouraging, Lourdes garbs. The youthful described the â€Å"midyear† (which converts into cleanser producer), the townsman, proprietor of a private company or property, whose sole way of thinking was regular realism, his solitary qualities were cash, his lone objective was gathering products and just standard and rule of direct advantage and searching for the path of least resistance. Innovation all around Europe, was a wide avian-grade development that began because of quick social changes and changes in the cutting edge world. All innovation shared the inclination that the cutting edge world was significantly extraordinary and cap â€Å"art expected to restore itself by going up against and investigating it’s own modernity’ (2). In Poland explicitly it was activated by feeling of being closed off in a miserable circumstance. It began with an emergency of qualities, when positivism which was maybe the most pervasive and agent world-see had gotten materialistic and lay, innovation found the supernatural and supernatural. Specialists began returning to Christian thoughts (this began in France, one may state as a cautious response after the division among chapel and state in 1871). Christian thoughts connected them back to a reestablished enthusiasm for the Middle Ages. The medieval times prompted investigating highly contrasting enchantment, mystery factions and religions, devils and Satanism. Chariot made shocking revelations in the etiology of frenzy, and researchers made associations between thoughts from the medieval times and current disclosures that prompted the formation of parapsychology †the brain research of strange, supernatural wonders. Life and it’s propensities was spoken to in work of art in an individual manner, separated through the craftsmen emotions and contemplations. Innovation, imagery, nonromantic, wantonness, was totally included in one specific development, under the standard of Ewing youthful: Young Germany, Young Belgium, Young Vienna, Young Scandinavia and obviously Young Poland. The primary work of art I will talk about is the 1894 â€Å"Melancholia† which means â€Å"melancholy’. The work of art shows a specialists studio, a painter’s studio to be exact. On the left side, at the top we can see the little figure of the painter, focused on the undertaking before him on the easel. An uproar of figures spills out of the canvas the craftsman is as of now taking a shot at. They are altogether metaphorical fugues, exemplifying the heartbreakingly history of Poland in the XIX century. You can judge by their despising and traits that they are portrayals of different layers of society. Upraises, ladies in tears of hopelessness, convicts in cuffs and laborer fighters. It appears that the figures are orchestrated in sequential request, beginning with adolescents on the more brilliant left side, close to the craftsmen, finishing with elderly people men on the differentiating right. The youthful appear to be looking forward with faces loaded with conferment and torment. Of the work of art we see a dynamic, confused mass of squirming figures. Most are looking indignantly towards the window. At the base of the fine art they appear to be coasting over the ground concentrating on battling each other as opposed to looking toward the principle focal point of the artistic creation which is the woman covered in dark, who is on the windowsill, looking outside into the bright nursery. I imagine that this woman is Melancholy. She is guarding the window, the door to opportunity. There is an elderly person on the windowsill taking a gander at her with despair, another in the center confronting her with his hands keeping his shirt down as though to state â€Å"stab me! Slaughter me! â€Å". It’s very clear that the Polish watcher will decipher this work of art as a portrayal of Polish history that had oaken spot in the only remaining century, however this canvas is really supposed to be one of the primary instances of Symbolism in the Visual Arts in Young Poland (1). It shows enthusiastic authentic substance yet not legitimately but instead through an allegory. Maleness’s didn’t attempt to discover or show all inclusive certainties yet rather demonstrated his own emotional view on the circumstance in his nation. My translation is that he was indicating the worthlessness of the national uprisings, the furnished journeys, the misery and the expectations of revolt, through the lady obstructing the section to opportunity. Step by step instructions to refer to Malczewski and the thoughts of Young Polnd, Papers

A full plate next week COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY - SIPA Admissions Blog

A full plate next week COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY - SIPA Admissions Blog MONDAY, MARCH 31, 2014 2014 Human Rights Essay Contest Colloquium 12:00 pm to 1:45 pm International Affairs Building, Room 1302 Presentations by participants in ISHRs 2014 Human Rights Essay Contest. Each presentation will be followed by QA and discussion with students, faculty, and other members of the Columbia University community. Refreshments will be served. Please RSVP. Sponsor: Institute for the Study of Human Rights Briefing on Deans Public Policy Challenge Grant 12:00 pm to 1:00 pm International Affairs Building, Room 1501 A briefing for students interesting in applying for the SIPA Deans Challenge Grant, hosted by Dean Merit E. Janow, Dean, School of International and Public Affairs; Professor, Practice of International Economic Law and International Affairs. Sponsor: School of International and Public Affairs SUMASA Sustainability Symposium: If You Lead, Will They Follow? 1:00 pm to 3:30 pm Casa Italiana Speakers: Kevin Joseph Bernard, Co-Founder, New York Oyster Week; Satyajit Bose, Lecturer in the Discipline of Economics and Continuing Education, School of Continuing Education, Columbia UniversityTravis Bradford, Director, Energy and Environment Concentration, School of International and Public Affairs, Associate Professor of Professional Practice, School of International and Public Affairs, Columbia University; Aaron Chan, MSSM Degree Candidate, Columbia University; Jessica Cooper, Project Manager and Sustainability Director, Delos Cooper LLC; Dana Gulley, Community Outreach and Volunteer Coordinator, RiverKeeper; Upmanu Lall, Director, Columbia Water Center, the The Earth Institute, Columbia University, Senior Research Scientist, International Research Institute for Climate and Society, the The Earth Institute, Columbia University, Alan and Carol Silberstein Professor, Earth and Environmental Engineering, Civil Engineering, Engineering Mechanics, Columbia University; Guido Molina ri, Chief Executive Officer, Divino; Jessica Prata, Assistant Vice President, Office of Environmental Stewardship, Lecturer, School of Continuing Education, Columbia University; Shruthi Rao, Managing Consultant, Adapt Ready; George Sarrinikolaou, Director, Office of Academic and Research Programs, The Earth Institute, Lecturer, School of Continuing Education, Columbia University; Josh Treuhaft, Analyst: Foresight and Innovation, Arup; Lynnette Widder, Principal and Co-founder of aardvarchitecture, Lecturer, School of Continuing Education, Columbia University Sponsor: The Student Association for Columbia University’s Master of Science in Sustainability Management Alec Ross: Geopolitics of Cyber with Anya Schiffrin 1:00 pm to 3:00 pm International Affairs Building, Room 1512 A lecture series with Alec Ross, former Senior Advisor for Innovation to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton; and Anya Schiffrin, Director, International Media, Communications, and Advocacy Specialization. Sponsor: School of International and Public Affairs, International Media, Communications, and Advocacy Specialization China and the Environment: A Conversation 3:00 pm to 4:30 pm International Affairs Building, Room 918 A Panel Discussion with Isabel N. Hilton, Editor, Chinadialogue; Micah S. Muscolino, Associate Professor, Department of History, Georgetown University; Peter C. Perdue, Professor, Department of History, Yale University. Moderated by Eugenia Lean, Associate Professor of Chinese History, Department of East Asian Languages and Cultures, Columbia University. No registration required. Sponsor: Weatherhead East Asian Institute Are Israels Policies Justified in Light of the Security Issues it Faces? 7:30 pm to 8:30 pm Barnard College Diana Center, Event Oval A debate on Israels policies. Sponsor: Columbia International Relations Council and Association TUESDAY, APRIL 01, 2014 Beijings March Westward: Eurasian Energy Pipelines and China All Day Event International Affairs Building, Room 1501 Join the Harriman Institute for its 8th annual conference, part of the colloquia series, entitled “Eurasian Pipelines â€" Road to Peace, Development and Interdependencies.” Sponsor: Harriman Institute Beyond Open Data: Leveraging Information and Collaboration to Illuminate Trends in Cambodia and Across the Lower Mekong Region 1:00 pm to 2:00 pm International Affairs Building, Room 801 Terry Parnell, East-West Management Institute Open Development Cambodia, will discuss her recent paper on open data, leveraging information and collaboration to illuminate development trends in Cambodia and the Mekong Region. Sponsor Economic and Political Development Concentration Sustainable Electronics and the Bottom Line 6:00 pm to 10:00 pm Columbia University Club of New York 15 West 43 Street An expert panel will discuss sustainability issues surrounding conflict minerals, labor conditions and e-waste, as well as illustrate business cases for electronics companies leading the way in sustainable practices. The discussion will also highlight business opportunities to close the gap in achieving an ethical electronics life cycle. Sponsor: Sustainable Business Committee, Columbia Business School Alumni Club of New York SIPA Deans Roundtable on Technology, Entrepreneurship, and Urban Innovation 6:00 pm to 7:30 pm International Affairs Building, Room 1501 A roundtable discussing the application of digital technology and advanced data analytics to foster improvements to urban environments around the world. The event will be hosted by Dean Merit E. Janow of SIPA and Silicon Valley entrepreneur Joe Lonsdale, the co-founder of Palantir and founder of Addepar, among other companies. Panelists include Daniel Doctoroff, CEO and President of Bloomberg LLP and former Deputy Mayor of New York City; Jeffrey Sachs, Director, The The Earth Institute, Quetelet Professor of Sustainable Development, and Professor of Health Policy and Management; James D. Robinson III, co-founder, RRE Ventures and former CEO, American Express; Patricia Culligan, Professor of Civil Engineering Mechanics, Associate Director, Institute for Data Science and Engineering, and Co-Director, The The Earth Institute’s Urban Design Lab; Carter Cleveland, CEO of Artsy; Zachary Bookman, co-founder and CEO of OpenGov; Rohit Aggarwala, Professor of Professional Practice in Interna tional and Public Affairs at SIPA and an expert on urban sustainability. Sponsor: School of International and Public Affairs Economic Challenges of the Political Transition in Chile 6:00 pm to 7:30 pm International Affairs Building, Room 707 Talk and discussion with Ricardo French-Davis, Professor of Economics at the University of Chile. Sponsor: Economic and Political Development Concentration Conviction, Conflict, Community: A Conversation with George Rupp 6:00 pm to 7:30 pm Carnegie Council 170 East 64th Street A conversation with George Rupp, senior fellow at Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs; adjunct Professor of religion, public health, and international affairs at Columbia University; founding principal of NEXT: Network for Executive Transition. Sponsor: Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs WEDNESDAY, APRIL 02, 2014 The Role of Technology and the Coast Guard in a Constrained Budget Environment 12:15 pm to 2:00 pm International Affairs Building, Room 1302 Part of the Military Technology Series with Captain Charles Cashin, Coast Guard Military Fellow, Council on Foreign Relations. Sponsor: Saltzman Institute of War and Peace Studies Post-Fukushima Energy Policy of Japan: Role of Nuclear Power 12:30 pm to 2:00 pm International Affairs Building, Room 1501 Discussion with Nobuo Tanaka, Fellow, Center on Global Energy Policy, and former Executive Director, International Energy Agency. Sponsor: Center on Global Energy Policy Vitor Gaspar 2:00 pm to 3:30 pm International Affairs Building, Room 1512 Vitor Gaspar, Portugals former Finance Minister and architect of the countrys €78bn bailout plan. Sponsor: Center on Global Economic Governance The Earth Institute Practicum in Innovative Sustainability Leadership: Standards and Metrics for Sustainability 6:10 pm to 7:00 pm Columbia University, Morningside Campus, Havemeyer Hall, Room 209 Speaker: Cynthia Cummis, Deputy Director, GHG Protocol, World Resources Institute Sponsor: The Earth Institute Expanding the Frontiers of Development Thought 6:15 pm to 8:00 pm International Affairs Building, Room 1501 Join David Malone, Rector of the United Nations University, and José Antonio Ocampo, Professor and Director of Economic and Political Development concentration, for a discussion on expanding the frontiers of development thought. Sponsor: Economic and Political Development Concentration Mali One Year On: Building An Enduring Peace Through Stabilization, Reform, and Development 6:30 pm to 8:00 pm International Affairs Building, Room 1302 Discussion with David Gressly, Deputy Representative of UN Mission in Mali, moderated by Dipali Mukhopadhyay, Assistant Professor, Saltzman Institute of War and Peace Studies at Columbia SIPA. Sponsor: ICR Specialization and Center for International Conflict Resolution at Columbia University. More Clicks, Fewer Bricks: The Lecture Hall is Obsolete 6:45 pm to 8:15 pm Miller Theater A debate about online education. Sponsor: The Richman Center, Intelligence Squared THURSDAY, APRIL 03, 2014 The Democratic Surround: Multimedia and the Politics of Attention in Cold War America 12:00 pm to 1:45 pm Pulitzer Hall, Room 601B A talk by Fred Turner, Associate Professor of Communication and Director of the Program in Science, Technology, and Society, Stanford University. Introduction by Richard John, Professor of Communications and History, Columbia University. Sponsored by the Blinken European Institute and the Communications Ph.D. program at the Columbia Journalism School. Sponsor: Blinken European Institute The Evolution of Submarine Warfare and Technology 12:15 pm to 2:00 pm International Affairs Building, Room 1302 The Comparative Defense Studies Program presents the Military Technology Series: Number 11 with Andrea Gilli, Visiting Scholar, Saltzman Institute of War and Peace Studies, and Associate Fellow, European Union Institute for Security Studies. Sponsor: Saltzman Institute of War and Peace Studies Mega Treaties on International Trade and Investment: The Public Policy Implications of the TPP and T-TIP 3:00 pm to 5:00 pm Uris Hall, Room 142 A panel discussion with Jeffrey D. Sachs, Director, The Earth Institute; Thea Lee, Deputy Chief of Staff, AFL-CIO; and Peter Petri, Carl Shaprio Professor of International Finance, Brandeis University. Moderated by Lise Johnson, Senior Legal Researcher, Investment Law and Policy, Vale Columbia Center on Sustainable International Investment. Sponsor: Vale Columbia Center on Sustainable International Investment Development Workshop: Edward Miguel 4:15 pm to 5:45 pm International Affairs Building, Room 1101 As part of Columbia Universitys Spring 2014 Development Workshop,Ted Miguel, Oxfam Professor of Environmental and Resource Economics at the University of California, Berkeley will present his recent work. Sponsor: Center for Development Economics and Policy Why Nations Succeed: The Social, Economic and Legal Building Blocks for Success 6:00 pm to 8:00 pm International Affairs Building, Room 1501 Expert scholars discuss the challenges of poverty and violence and how to tackle these issues and build successful nations. Sponsor: Center on Global Economic Governance Book Talk: Buying Time: The Delayed Crisis of Democratic Capitalism by Wolfgang Streeck 6:00 pm to 8:00 pm International Affairs Building, Room 707 A panel with Wolfgang Streeck, author and Director, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies; Adam Tooze, Professor of History, Yale University; Katharina Pistor, Professor of Law, Columbia Law School; Bruce Kogut, Professor Leadership and Ethics, Columbia Business School. Sponsor: Blinken European Institute Spring 2014 Conflict Resolution Alumni Career Panel and Mixer 6:00 pm to 8:00 pm Grace Dodge Hall, Rooms 177 and 179 Speakers: Various Sponsor: The Earth Institute FRIDAY, APRIL 04, 2014 Poetry and Translation: A Conversation with Grzegorz Wróblewski and Piotr Gwiazda 4:00 pm to 6:00 pm International Affairs Building, Room 1219 A poetry reading by Grzegorz Wróblewski. Wróblewski will read in Polish from his new book Kopenhaga. The reading will be followed by a discussion about poetry and translation with Anna Frajlich, Senior Lecturer, Columbia University. Sponsor: East Central European Center